|
(for
Newsletter Archives, click here)
THE DYSLEXIA
SOLUTION
Volume 2 #10 June
2003
NEWSLETTER
I got an e-mail the other day from a mother who was upset
because her little boy wanted to take trumpet lessons in
school so he could be in the school band. He had been told
that because he was dyslectic and couldn’t read, he
wouldn’t be able to read music, either, so he wouldn’t
be allowed to take trumpet. The mother was extremely upset
and I don’t blame her. Imagine what it did to that
poor child’s ego to be put down once more as inadequate,
prevented from doing something that would have been really
fun, and made, yet again, to look stupid, in the eyes of
those lucky pals who were allowed to play in the band.
If the music teacher knew anything about dyslexia, she
would have known that reading words and reading music are
two different
processes, done in different parts of the brain, that have
nothing whatever to do with each other. There are professional
musicians who are severely dyslectic, speed readers who couldn’t
carry a tune in a paper bag, speed readers who are excellent
musicians, and dyslectic people who are totally tone deaf.
The two conditions are unrelated, because each activity is
done in a different part of the brain.
When you read a word, you are assigning a linguistic noise
to a certain shape, like a double curve (ss-s-ss-s) or
a lumpy looking thing (mm-m -m m). When you read music, you
are matching come little black dots to a place on a fence,
which you must coordinate with a finger or arm position.
The second is strictly a spatial and rhythmic task with
no
linguistic content.
But how about fluency? Can a child who will never read
fluently be able to sight-read music fluently? In any physical
activity,
whether typing, reading, sight-reading, ballet dancing, skiing,
or whatever, fluency comes only with the three things that
you need to get into Carnegie Hall: practice, practice, and
practice. A dyslectic child in seventh grade who has gotten
up to grade level in accuracy and comprehension will still
be behind his friends in fluency because they have spent
seven years reading, reading, and reading. The important
thing for him is not speed at that point, but comprehension.
Similarly, he will be a fluent sight-reader on the trumpet
only after he has had a lot of practice
A little comprehension of the problem wouldn’t hurt
the music teacher, either. Teaching Tip:
Comprehension requires mentally digging into the meaning
of a sentence, not just pronouncing the words correctly.
To encourage this, have a young student read a sentence out
loud, then put your hand over it and make him tell you what
the sentence said. (Not necessarily word for word, but the
meaning.) If he can’t, uncover the sentence and repeat
the process. It isn’t long before his mind realizes
that he MUST understand what he has just read and begin to
focus. With an older student, you can do it with several
sentences or a short paragraph. The older student who is
studying at home can do it with his homework. Covering the
words with his own hand is even more effective than having
the teacher do it. He is in control and nobody is watching.
Would you like to receive these newsletters via email on
a monthly basis? If so, enter your email address here:
Archives (2001 files in .doc format):
|
| May 2003 - Vol. 2,
#9 |
May
2002 - Vol. 1, #9 |
| April
2003 - Vol. 2, #8 |
March
2002 - Vol. 1, #8 |
| March
2003 - Vol. 2 #7 |
February
2002 - Vol. 1, #7 |
| January
2003 - Vol. 2, #5 |
January
2002 - Vol. 1, #6 |
| December
2002 - Vol. 2, #4 |
December
2001 - Vol. 1, #5 |
| November
2002 - Vol. 2, #3 |
November
2001 - Vol. 1, #4 |
| October
2002 - Vol. 2, #2 |
October
2001 - Vol. 1, #3 |
| September
2002 - Vol. 2, #1 |
September
2001 - Vol. 1, #2 |
| August
2002 - Vol. 1, #11 |
August
2001 - Vol. 1, #1 |
| July
2002 - Vol. 1, #10 |
|
|